Tuesday , November 21 2017
Breaking News
You are here: Home / Michael Sullivan (page 4)

Category Archives: Michael Sullivan

Feed Subscription<

Mike Sullivan is a Sovereign Grace Full Preterist and co-author of the book, “House Divided Bridging the Gap in Reformed Eschatology a Preterist Response to When Shall These Things Be?

If A (Matt. 24) Was Fulfilled in AD 70 [Partial Preterism/Full Preterism] and is = to B (1 Thess. 4-5) [Classic Amillennialism/Full Preterism], and B (1 Thess. 4) is = to C (1 Cor. 15) [All Agree], Then A (Matt. 24), B (1 Thess. 4), and C (1 Cor. 15) Were All Fulfilled in AD 70 / Two or More Things that Are Equal to Another Thing Are Also Equal to Each Other / With An Exegesis of Each Passage Proving the Full Preterist Case!

By Michael J. Sullivan Hermeneutics is defined as “the study or science of interpreting the Scriptures.” The Westminster Confession of Faith correctly states that, “The infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture, is the Scripture itself; and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any Scripture (which is not manifold,… Read More »

Appendix in “House Divided” – Responding to Gary DeMar/Sam Frost’s Incoherent “Arguments” Against Full Preterism

House Divided Bridging the Gap in Reformed Eschatology A Preterist Response to When Shall These Things Be? Appendix – Responding to Gary DeMar/Sam Frost’s Incoherent “Arguments” Against Full Preterism Copyright 2009 and 2013 All rights reserved.  No part of this book (or article) may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the… Read More »

A FULL PRETERIST RESPONSE TO “HOLY LAND,” “END TIME,” “HOLY WAR” ESCHATOLOGIES – PART 3 “CHRISTIAN” DISPENSATIONAL ZIONISM

Michael J. Sullivan (Copyright 2014) Part 1 Islam – Refuting “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: http://fullpreterism.com/a-full-preterist-response-to-in-the-land-end-time-holy-war-eschatologies-part-1-islam/ Part 2 Judaism – Refuting “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: http://fullpreterism.com/a-full-preterist-response-to-in-the-land-end-of-time-holy-war-eschatologies-part-2-judaism/ Part 3 “Christian” Dispensational Zionism – Refuting “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: http://fullpreterism.com/a-full-preterist-response-to-holy-land-end-time-holy-war-eschatologies-part-3-christian-dispensational-zionism/ We now close in refuting the third guilty party… Read More »

A FULL PRETERIST RESPONSE TO “HOLY LAND,” “END OF TIME,” “HOLY WAR” ESCHATOLOGIES – PART 2 JUDAISM (THE ARTICLE FACEBOOK DOESN’T WANT YOU TO READ!)

By Michael J. Sullivan (Copyright 2014) We are continuing our study of the three eschatologies (views of prophecy) within Islam, Judaism, and “Christian” Dispensational Zionism which emphasize a “in the land,” “end time,” “holy war,” by which their god or religion overcomes the others.  These views of eschatology  have contributed to the perpetual war in… Read More »

A FULL PRETERIST RESPONSE TO “HOLY LAND,” “END TIME,” “HOLY WAR,” ESCHATOLOGIES – PART 1 ISLAM

Michael J. Sullivan (Copyright 2014) Part 1 Islam – Refuting and Healing “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: http://fullpreterism.com/a-full-preterist-response-to-in-the-land-end-time-holy-war-eschatologies-part-1-islam/ Part 2 Judaism – Refuting and Healing “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: http://fullpreterism.com/a-full-preterist-response-to-in-the-land-end-of-time-holy-war-eschatologies-part-2-judaism/ Part 3 “Christian” Dispensational Zionism – Refuting and Healing “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: http://fullpreterism.com/a-full-preterist-response-to-holy-land-end-time-holy-war-eschatologies-part-3-christian-dispensational-zionism/ Introduction “The War… Read More »

PART 4 – DEBATE CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE TO: JAMES WHITE, ANTHONY ROGERS, SAM SHAMOUN AND SHABIR ALLY (1 THESS. 4:16-17 & ACTS 1:9-11)

Introduction: For those of you who may be joining this series a little late (not having read parts 1-3c.), let me briefly catch you up.  In a debate between a Christian futurist (James White) and a Muslim (Shabir Ally), Shabir brought up Matthew 16:27-28/Matthew 24:34/1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 and claimed that since Jesus (and the rest of… Read More »

PART 3c. – DEBATE CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE TO: JAMES WHITE, ANTHONY ROGERS, SAM SHAMOUN, SHABIR ALLY: MATTHEW 24-25 “THIS GENERATION” AND DIVISION THEORIES REFUTED

We are continuing our series observing how Christian (futurist) apologists to Muslims haven’t been able to deal with Muslims stealing liberal and Bible skeptic arguments concerning how an imminent (and in their view “failed”) Second Coming in the NT overthrows Jesus’ claims to be divine and a faithful prophet. As we have noticed, James White… Read More »

PART 3b. DEBATE CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE TO: JAMES WHITE, SHABIR ALLY, SAM SHAMOUN, AND ANTHONY ROGERS – THE COMING OF THE SON OF MAN (MATT. 24:27—-25:31) FULFILLED BY AD 70

Introduction We are continuing our series examining how James White and other futurist apologists cannot address the issue of NT imminence in public debate with unbelievers (in this case a debate with Muslim apologist Shabir Ally). Currently we are going through Matthew 24 since James White was unable to address this passage with Shabir in… Read More »

PART 3a. DEBATE CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE TO: JAMES WHITE, SHABIR ALLY, ANTHONY ROGERS, SAM SHAMOUN – ALL THE SIGNS, ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION, TRIBULATION, TIMES OF THE GENTILES – “IN FULFILLMENT OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN” (MATT. 24:1-25/LUKE 21:20-24)

Introduction Now I want to move on to another passage White virtually avoided altogether in his debate with Shabir Ally (ie. Matthew 24) and was the subject of Anthony Rogers unfinished article series responding to Shabir (since White “dreads” [his words] the subject). I personally believe White was a bit deceptive with Shabir in that… Read More »