Monday , February 19 2018
Breaking News

My Full Preterist Response to the Michael Brown v. Rabbi Tovia Singer Debate – Is Jesus Messiah? Part 3 – Daniel 7:13-14/Daniel 9:24-27/Dan. 12:1-7; Luke 21:20-22, 27-32 & Jewish Traditions/Talmud

If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! Introduction I am continuing my series critiquing Dr. Michael Brown’s YouTube debates since I am going through them in preparation for my debate with him on 1 Corinthians 13:8-12.  I will be arguing “that which is perfect” (v. 10)… Read More »

My Full Preterist Response to the Michael Brown v. James White Debates – Part 1 Matthew 23:37-39 Sovereignty of God & Eschatology Issues

Introduction I am excited to announce that Dr. Michael Brown has agreed to debate me over 1 Corinthians 13:8-12.  I have sent them the following: Resolved – The Bible teaches that the miraculous gift of speaking in tongues, (and the other miraculous gifts of the Spirit mentioned in 1 Corinthians 13:8-12) ceased at the Second… Read More »

Matthew 23:39: The Song of Ascent

By Don K. Preston I have read with interest Stanley Toussaint’s critique of preterism. It is evident that to him, Matthew 23:39 presents a daunting challenge to the true preterist paradigm. I would like to present some thoughts on this great verse that, hopefully, will demonstrate the fallacy of Toussaint’s critique. Clearly, I will not… Read More »

If A (Dan. 12:1-4) Was Fulfilled in AD 70 [Partial Preterism NOW agrees w/ Full Preterism] and is = to B (Rev. 20:4-15) [and is ONE Judgment & Resurrection Event – Classical Amillennialism & Full Preterism agree], AND B (Rev. 20:4-15) is = to C (John 5:24-29) [All Agree], THEN A (Dan. 12:1-4) is = to C (John 5:24-29) “THEREFORE, Things Which Are Equal to the Same Thing Are Also Equal to One Another” – Daniel 12=Revelation 20=John 5 – ALL Fulfilled in AD 70

In a book seeking to refute Full Preterism (When Shall These Things Be?) seven Reformed theologians who were either Partial Preterists or Amillennialists, sought to refute Full Preterism on the grounds that the resurrection of the dead did not take place spiritually in AD 70.  And yet as we pointed out in our book (House… Read More »

If A (Matt. 24) Was Fulfilled in AD 70 [Partial Preterism/Full Preterism] and is = to B (1 Thess. 4-5) [Classic Amillennialism/Full Preterism], and B (1 Thess. 4) is = to C (1 Cor. 15) [All Agree], Then A (Matt. 24), B (1 Thess. 4), and C (1 Cor. 15) Were All Fulfilled in AD 70 / Two or More Things that Are Equal to Another Thing Are Also Equal to Each Other / With An Exegesis of Each Passage Proving the Full Preterist Case!

By Michael J. Sullivan Hermeneutics is defined as “the study or science of interpreting the Scriptures.” The Westminster Confession of Faith correctly states that, “The infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture, is the Scripture itself; and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any Scripture (which is not manifold,… Read More »

Appendix in “House Divided” – Responding to Gary DeMar/Sam Frost’s Incoherent “Arguments” Against Full Preterism

House Divided Bridging the Gap in Reformed Eschatology A Preterist Response to When Shall These Things Be? Appendix – Responding to Gary DeMar/Sam Frost’s Incoherent “Arguments” Against Full Preterism Copyright 2009 and 2013 All rights reserved.  No part of this book (or article) may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the… Read More »


Michael J. Sullivan (Copyright 2014) Part 1 Islam – Refuting “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: Part 2 Judaism – Refuting “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: Part 3 “Christian” Dispensational Zionism – Refuting “Holy Land” “End Time” “Holy War” Eschatology: We now close in refuting the third guilty party… Read More »